Reorganizing a Medicine Residency Program in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York.

The COVID-19 pandemic has been particularly severe in New York City, resulting in a rapid influx of patients into New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center. The challenges precipitated by this pandemic have required urgent changes to existing models of care. Internal medicine residents are at the forefront of caring for patients with COVID-19, including the critically ill. This article describes the exigent restructuring of the New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Internal Medicine Residency Program. Patient care and educational models were fundamentally reconceptualized, which required a transition away from traditional hierarchical team structures and a significant expansion in the program's capacity and flexibility to care for large numbers of patients with disproportionately high levels of critical illness. These changes were made while the residency program maintained the priorities of patient care and safety, resident safety and well-being, open communication, and education. The process of adapting the residency program to the demands of the pandemic was iterative given the unprecedented nature of this crisis. The goal of this article is to share the experiences and lessons learned from this crisis, communicate the solutions that were designed, and inform others who may be facing the prospect of creating similar disaster response measures.

Improving symptom management in hemodialysis patients: identifying barriers and future directions.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) patients experience significant symptom burden that is often undertreated. OBJECTIVE: This study identified (1) barriers to symptom management in the HD population, (2) potential targets for improving symptom burden, (3) provider attitudes toward palliative care for HD patients, and (4) perceptions of how transplant eligibility impacts care. DESIGN: Semistructured, one-on-one interviews were conducted, audiotaped, and transcribed. Data were analyzed qualitatively by two investigators to identify discrete themes. SETTING/SUBJECTS: Health care providers (HCPs) and caregivers were recruited (June to October 2012) from three outpatient HD units in New York City. MEASUREMENTS: Open-ended questions were used with follow-up probes. RESULTS: Interviews were completed with 34 HCPs (8 physicians, 2 nurse practitioners, 4 social workers, 13 registered nurses, 7 patient care technicians) and 20 caregivers (14 family members, 5 home health aides, 1 friend). Barriers to symptom control were identified in three areas: (1) provider unawareness of symptoms, (2) provider's uncertainty as to whose responsibility it is to treat symptoms, and (3) inherent difficulty in symptom management. Ideas for ameliorating symptoms included enhancing systems for patient/caregiver education, improving systems for HCP communication with other disciplines, and encouraging alternative methods of dialysis when appropriate. HCPs also expressed discomfort with the term "palliative care." CONCLUSIONS: Renal HCPs are often unaware of the magnitude of symptom burden in their HD patients. This study found that there is lack of ownership for assessing and treating these symptoms. Providers also feel certain symptoms are "untreatable." Research is needed to develop effective treatment strategies for HD populations.

Disparities in symptom burden and renal transplant eligibility: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD) suffer from a high symptom burden. However, there is significant heterogeneity within the HD population; certain subgroups, such as the elderly, may experience disproportionate symptom burden. OBJECTIVES: The study's objective was to propose a category of HD patients at elevated risk for symptom burden (those patients who are not transplant candidates) and to compare symptomatology among transplant ineligible versus eligible HD patients. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. SETTING/SUBJECTS: English-speaking, cognitively intact patients receiving HD and who were either transplant eligible (n=25) or ineligible (n=32) were recruited from two urban HD units serving patients in the greater New York City region. MEASUREMENTS: In-person interviews were conducted to ascertain participants' symptom burden using the Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI), perceived symptom bother and attribution (whether the symptom was perceived to be related to HD treatment), and quality of life using the SF-36. Participants' medical records were reviewed to collect demographic and clinical data. RESULTS: Transplant ineligible (versus eligible) patients reported an average of 13.9±4.6 symptoms versus 9.2±4.4 symptoms (p<0.01); these differences persisted after adjustment for multiple factors. A greater proportion of transplant ineligible (versus eligible) patients attributed their symptoms to HD and were more likely to report greater bother on account of the symptoms. Quality of life was also significantly lower in the transplant ineligible group. CONCLUSIONS: Among HD patients, transplant eligibility is associated with symptom burden. Our pilot data suggest that consideration be given to employing transplant status as a method of identifying HD patients at risk for greater symptom burden and targeting them for palliative interventions.